tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8897997766931633186.post6976567085413842489..comments2024-02-14T03:21:37.506-05:00Comments on Monetary Freedom: Scott Sumner Day!Bill Woolseyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06330232724290161369noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8897997766931633186.post-69823159803871881582012-09-16T15:06:22.489-04:002012-09-16T15:06:22.489-04:00Yeah, I am Woodford and I woke up 5 AM to wrote a ...Yeah, I am Woodford and I woke up 5 AM to wrote a post. Common, I am one of Scott's fan, though let us not pretend that Woodford did not know what is NGDP targeting before (especially when he mentioned it in his paper).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8897997766931633186.post-91996874629936499072012-09-16T12:42:45.098-04:002012-09-16T12:42:45.098-04:00I see what you did there, anonymous - or should I ...I see what you did there, anonymous - or should I say, <i>Mr. Woodford</i>???Saturoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01914831276101897944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8897997766931633186.post-47842724490778227972012-09-16T05:08:01.491-04:002012-09-16T05:08:01.491-04:00PeterP, NGDP target is actually a special case of ...PeterP, NGDP target is actually a special case of Eggertsson-Woodford, 2003. In fact, Sumner mentioned in one of his first blogposts that Woodford "emphasizes the importance of changes in the expected future path of monetary policy". So Woodford might affected Sumner and then Sumner back Woodford. Anyway Sumner deserves a lot of credit for the contribution to the discussion about NGDP targeting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8897997766931633186.post-81350002613958174262012-09-15T23:00:03.832-04:002012-09-15T23:00:03.832-04:00Funny thing, appears that Woodford wasn't infl...Funny thing, appears that Woodford wasn't influenced by Sumner and neither was Bernanke. September Fool's day?PeterPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02032621777697914182noreply@blogger.com